Thanks for the info. I checked and it's set to show original. Bogging is not too bad because you can wait it out, which is still no fun. It's when it freezes it's over. It has only frozen a few times so to prevent it I just do groups. I could probably make bigger groups but when I do them by theme like a particular bird for example, over time I found it helpful. I can concentrate on that bird and do different one in the next group. So scrolling left to right or back is very fast.

6 sec from 35 MB RAW to 16 bit tif is pretty fast. and the reds in my photos look exact as shooted: crisp, not too blueish, not too much orange.

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

I knew something was going on between Canon and Adobe. With the R5 LrC/ACR did not have camera colour profiles for about a year. Some attributed it to Adobe being lazy but I always thought they ironing out some legal issues. You know what happens when lawyers from two big corporations go into a room.

Feb 22, 2024 — Biggest companies in the Ball Bearing Manufacturing industry in the US · Timken Co Market Share: x.x% · Schaeffler Ag Market Share: x.x% · NSK ...

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

Hmmm. Maybe the bottleneck is the computer? I generally do a group of about 1000 - 1500 pics at a time (before I notice any ill effects). I can run through them (and rate them) about as fast as I can hit the " x " key and then the arrow keys. I do have a pretty fast machine though.

.. just playing around with my M3 und updated DPP. I wondered why DPP outputs noisy and kind of pixelated tifs. Problem were my settings: I checked "use USM (6/4/4)" instead of "use sharpness (4)".

Canon has sure have not done much. The last thing I remember of any significance was adding DLO which was over a decade ago. They started cloud based editing for neural NR which I believe didn't go so well.

They are very different bikes. The transalp is only an upgrade to the 300L if you're mostly focused on gravel roads and/or pavement. The ...

Lb Soft And Moist Swt Dried Crby Oc 25 Pound Each - 1 Per Case. SKU. WFS-677211. Price Check. HRS Club Members earn points for their purchases.

I like that it shows as a finished Jpeg so the in camera settings like sharpening, etc are applied. Canon's fit to screen scaling is very good.

Static Load Rating for Spherical Plain Bearings. Static load rating is used when spherical plain bearings remain stationary under load (or make occasional ...

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

A faster sensor, improved autofocus and video see Nikon's third-gen mid-range full-framer go toe-to-toe against Canon's EOS R6 II and the Sony a7 IV. We feel its all-round ability lifts it to the top of the pile.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

Thanks Guys. I'm getting a similar reaction as Zeee, more than about 10-20 at a time and quick check becomes glacial-check. ;). Maybe it is my editing rigs specs but I built it only a few years back for flight simming and works fine for that.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

Hmmm. Maybe the bottleneck is the computer? I generally do a group of about 1000 - 1500 pics at a time (before I notice any ill effects). I can run through them (and rate them) about as fast as I can hit the " x " key and then the arrow keys. I do have a pretty fast machine though.

PS...I'm not really into altering the pictures or manipulating the shot (changing the colour of the sky, covering over something in the shot etc), more just getting the max out of the data in the picture (bringing out the detail in the shadows etc).

I had not used dpp in a while, but just got an r5 and my CO is an old version so I tried it. It must take 15 seconds to process a file while the camera can spit out a jpg in an instant. Frustrating is what I'd call it.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.

What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.

Yeah, freaking Canon is super lazy on this. When I upgraded my MBP from Intel to M1, a twice as fast of a CPU for most computational tasks, DPP is only 5% faster in my non-scientific tests for RAW conversions. I hope Apple will deprecate the Rosetta emulator to force Canon to get off its ass and do some work.

I had not used dpp in a while, but just got an r5 and my CO is an old version so I tried it. It must take 15 seconds to process a file while the camera can spit out a jpg in an instant. Frustrating is what I'd call it.

Thanks for the info. I checked and it's set to show original. Bogging is not too bad because you can wait it out, which is still no fun. It's when it freezes it's over. It has only frozen a few times so to prevent it I just do groups. I could probably make bigger groups but when I do them by theme like a particular bird for example, over time I found it helpful. I can concentrate on that bird and do different one in the next group. So scrolling left to right or back is very fast.

Needle roller bearing 15-22-12mm - opened (Jawa 350 638 639 640) ... Gasket of the carburetor flange - 1.5mm (Jawa 350 638 639 640) /. Gasket of ...

Yeah, freaking Canon is super lazy on this. When I upgraded my MBP from Intel to M1, a twice as fast of a CPU for most computational tasks, DPP is only 5% faster in my non-scientific tests for RAW conversions. I hope Apple will deprecate the Rosetta emulator to force Canon to get off its ass and do some work.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

We don't usually test a product for ten years before reviewing it, but after a decade of using the Lowepro Photo Sport 300 AW II on an almost daily basis, Managing Editor Dale Baskin tells us why he loves this pack.

Aug 28, 2023 — Resistance and Load Capacity: Bushings tend to exhibit higher resistance during operation but possess greater load-carrying capacity and lower ...

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. If it is a LrC/CR plugin that opens DPP what will be the format when it comes back? I was hoping that the codecs for true Canon colors, not emulations would be right in LrC/ACR. I have this feeling that it goes to DPP and you want to use the neural options there may be a cost attached to it. I hope not.

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

Budget friendly shipping boxes for lightweight shipments. Ship toys, clothing, towels and other durable items. 32 ECT boxes are up to 19% lighter than 200 ...

I like that it shows as a finished Jpeg so the in camera settings like sharpening, etc are applied. Canon's fit to screen scaling is very good.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

SKU: AR-13210 Category: Common Instruments- TPLO Description Low Profile Hohmann Retractor, 8.0mm x 16cm

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

Hmmm. Maybe the bottleneck is the computer? I generally do a group of about 1000 - 1500 pics at a time (before I notice any ill effects). I can run through them (and rate them) about as fast as I can hit the " x " key and then the arrow keys. I do have a pretty fast machine though.

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

6 sec from 35 MB RAW to 16 bit tif is pretty fast. and the reds in my photos look exact as shooted: crisp, not too blueish, not too much orange.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

Image

Thanks for the info. I checked and it's set to show original. Bogging is not too bad because you can wait it out, which is still no fun. It's when it freezes it's over. It has only frozen a few times so to prevent it I just do groups. I could probably make bigger groups but when I do them by theme like a particular bird for example, over time I found it helpful. I can concentrate on that bird and do different one in the next group. So scrolling left to right or back is very fast.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

Yes indeed! My first cull is for sharpness (at 100%) and to cull out any "duplicates." Second cull is for composition. Third cull is (sometimes days later) to narrow it down further.

BRONCO 1-WAY CLUTCH BEARING KIT (AT-03A85) · BRONCO 1-WAY CLUTCH BEARING KIT.

For best speed you do have to make sure (in Preferences, Image processing 2) that you set "Show original image" in the "Quick check window settings", otherwise it'll bog down greatly.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

For best speed you do have to make sure (in Preferences, Image processing 2) that you set "Show original image" in the "Quick check window settings", otherwise it'll bog down greatly.

Image

I like that it shows as a finished Jpeg so the in camera settings like sharpening, etc are applied. Canon's fit to screen scaling is very good.

If there are hundreds of file I will group them in 20's or 30's. I try to keep the same theme in the groups. I pick the ones I want, select Quick Check - Full screen and use the arrows keys to scroll. It scrolls pretty quickly. I press X for the ones I want to delete. Then I use Edit - Rating - Select rejected images only. Then File - Move to trash.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.

Thanks for the info. I checked and it's set to show original. Bogging is not too bad because you can wait it out, which is still no fun. It's when it freezes it's over. It has only frozen a few times so to prevent it I just do groups. I could probably make bigger groups but when I do them by theme like a particular bird for example, over time I found it helpful. I can concentrate on that bird and do different one in the next group. So scrolling left to right or back is very fast.

Yeah, freaking Canon is super lazy on this. When I upgraded my MBP from Intel to M1, a twice as fast of a CPU for most computational tasks, DPP is only 5% faster in my non-scientific tests for RAW conversions. I hope Apple will deprecate the Rosetta emulator to force Canon to get off its ass and do some work.

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

I like that it shows as a finished Jpeg so the in camera settings like sharpening, etc are applied. Canon's fit to screen scaling is very good.

PS...I'm not really into altering the pictures or manipulating the shot (changing the colour of the sky, covering over something in the shot etc), more just getting the max out of the data in the picture (bringing out the detail in the shadows etc).

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

Once the R5 got profiles they were added to the R3 when the camera was shipped. Normally it used to take about 6 weeks. Canon released the new DPP for the R5II a few days ago. LrC/ACR had support in June and LrC 13.5 just added support/color profiles to the R1.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

Leica has announced the Q3 43, a variant of its full-frame fixed lens compact with a 43mm F2.0 normal lens. We've had the chance to use and test it, to produce an in-depth review.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

Yes indeed! My first cull is for sharpness (at 100%) and to cull out any "duplicates." Second cull is for composition. Third cull is (sometimes days later) to narrow it down further.

I had not used dpp in a while, but just got an r5 and my CO is an old version so I tried it. It must take 15 seconds to process a file while the camera can spit out a jpg in an instant. Frustrating is what I'd call it.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

Before imposing to LrC I pre-cull my files to delete unwanted ones using DPP - Quick Check - Full Screen. I find it pretty fast but if you do too many at once it can choke.

To help retain bearing lubrication and prevent contamination from the environment a seal (contact) or shield (non-contact) can be employed.

For best speed you do have to make sure (in Preferences, Image processing 2) that you set "Show original image" in the "Quick check window settings", otherwise it'll bog down greatly.

Since those replying here are presumably fellow DPP sufferers ;-), I was curious what you guys were using and what your general workflow looks like? So far I am leaning towards DxO photolab 7 but curious how you guys process your RAW shots? Are you doing anything to the photos first in DPP and then taking them into another software or just immediately diving into DxO, Adobe, etc first?

For best speed you do have to make sure (in Preferences, Image processing 2) that you set "Show original image" in the "Quick check window settings", otherwise it'll bog down greatly.

While it seems cumbersome to do it in groups it is not that bad. The last file you edited is highlighted so easy and fast to select the next group. I like how the files look in Quick Check and it's free.

Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.

I've been using DPP for years to edit my RAW files, and although slow, with the use of recipes, a little patience, and focussing my attention on just the key shots I wanted to develop I was fine. But since moving to the R5 when it first came out a few years ago, DPP has been driving me nuts. Even just using "quick check" to select the shots I want to focus on seems to takes for ages.

Yes indeed! My first cull is for sharpness (at 100%) and to cull out any "duplicates." Second cull is for composition. Third cull is (sometimes days later) to narrow it down further.

For best speed you do have to make sure (in Preferences, Image processing 2) that you set "Show original image" in the "Quick check window settings", otherwise it'll bog down greatly.